continuously strengthen the SDF deployment in the forefront of Southwest islands

in the just concluded Shangri-La dialogue meeting, Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo delivered a keynote speech on Asia Pacific security is stir up enmity, confuse the public. Whether it Cheap Arizona State Sun Devils Jerseys is in the Chinese dodge about groundless accusations, or the so-called "rule of three" principle, or is only "positive peace doctrine", will alienate one person from another, the harm others to benefit oneself "troublemakers" image completely unmasked.

Andouble in the speech out of the so-called "rule of three" principle, claims that countries should comply with international law, a country should not resort to force or threat of force in his country, must resolve disputes by peaceful means. Regardless of whether this formulation is new, the key problem is, who Cheap Mississippi State Bulldogs Jerseys the hell is the rule of behavior body Andouble referred to? Japan's Kyodo news that Andouble intended to "China, urged restraint". This is obviously stir up enmity. In the territorial sovereignty dispute, facing the Japanese, Philippine, more irrational provocation, Chinese isn't always maintained restraint? Chinese the doings of which a violation of international law? China did not seek to peaceful negotiations to solve national sovereignty disputes? Japan held frequently Island maneuver, continuously strengthen the SDF deployment Cheap Kansas State Wildcats Jerseys in the forefront of Southwest islands, is to seek a peaceful settlement of territorial disputes? Japan is committed to provide, the maritime patrol ship, encouraging them and Chinese confrontation, is the so-called "rule of law"? My body is not correct, but to judge others, it is There is no such a rule!

"positive peace doctrine" is a keyword in the Andouble speech. This concept is presented and written by Andouble himself in the Japanese "national security strategy", is the so-called "Andouble security" of the core connotation. The concepts in the national security strategy level to understand, "positive" means active as security, which of course including military means. This formed a direct echo and Andouble mentioned in his speech to the lifting of the ban "collective self-defence" problem. In view of this, "between the following positive" with the Japanese post-war "pacifist" clearly the existence of fundamental paradox.

as everyone knows, the core content of the ninth Japanese constitution article three: one is never as Japan in the name of the country's war, threat or use of force to settle international disputes by means; two is Japan does not maintain armed forces and other forces of war; three is a belligerent power doesn't recognize the country. Under the concept of peace constitution, and formed a "defensive" "three non nuclear principles" "don't do military power" and a series of self defense policy. Needless to say, the Constitution and the defense policy frame, implied military initiative as a "positive peace doctrine" is a clear violation of policy. In other words, Andouble's "positive peace doctrine" in the "peace" is not the real meaning of pacifism. "Positive peace doctrine" is Andouble before the implementation of constitutional, with hidden "military normalization" traction "in Japan to Qiang Junli" political strategy. If yes, Cheap Ohio State Buckeyes Jerseys Andouble request states to understand the risk of collective self-defence in Japan has been self-evident. (Yuan Yang) Cheap Houston Cougars Jerseys